This is a transcript of a week-long conference, given, I presume, in San Francisco in the early or mid 1980's.
I found Through the Looking Glass (above, another lecture transcribed) to be a ramble with some fairly good Questions & Answers at the end. So, when the new printing of The Magic Thread arrived (another set of transcribed lectures), I promised myself I would skip the gibberish in the front & go straight for the Q&A in the back.
But here I was pleasantly surprised by the editor, Gina Ceaglio, who has done a splendid job of shaping the transcript of The Magic Thread into something readable. So I can skip the Q&A's & go straight to Chapter 3: Richard's Step by Step Interpretation of the chart, using a magic thread of some sort. So here goes:
The chart Idemon interprets is for December 11, 1931, 5:13 pm, 21N, 77E. It has 13 Gemini rising, 0 Pisces on the MC, and a nice cluster in Capricorn in 7 & 8. Forgive me if, like Richard, I withhold the name & birthplace for a moment. It is someone we all know quite well.
Remember: The goal of chart interpretation is to describe the man in terms that make him recognizeable to us. As if we were artists, sketching with charcoal. Here is Richard Idemon's interpretation:
- A lot of planets in Capricorn: Lopsided.
- Saturn in Capricorn as final dispositor. (True) A wise old man, one who eats children. (False)
- Something of the nature of stability, inertia, gathering, hording, bringing in together, pulling in, is going to be an issue for this person in his life. . . Aren't you getting curious, or would you rather not know yet? (No. Not curious.)
- Something that erupts from the unconscious at a critical time.
- Zeus can be sneaky & get other people to do his dirty work.
- Someone who is kind of royal. (Wrong metaphor. Was this deliberate?)
- Enthusiasm, prana, creativity, vital energy flowing all over the place, but it's a closed system. (Some useful hints, but also misdirection.)
- The eternal optimist. (True)
- A great or brilliant communicator on some level and yet something may be missing. (More misdirection.)
- A glib person with nothing inside to back it up. (False)
- Pluto in Cancer in the 2nd are breasts flowing with milk, money, things, objects. (Over-reading the planet, and more misdirection.)
- Capricorn is the urge for perfection. A yogi, perhaps. (True in this case. Very true.)
- Not a person in an ivory tower. (More misdirection. Remember that magic is all about misdirection.)
- Some gibberish about Uranus. It's by itself in Aries in 11. Richard picks up the idea that planets have an impact on the house opposite to where they are domiciled, but I'm not certain he's worked out the details as to why.
- Moon/Saturn conjunct in Capricorn means you had a bad mother. (Major bad marks for Moon = mother. That's not even trying.)
- Moon/Uranus square: Fear of abandonment (emphasis in original). It's an exact square, but the signs are Capricorn to Aries & the houses are 8 to 11, so how do you get mommy from any of that? Is that all the Moon is? Mommy?!
- Moon/Pluto opposed, six degrees applying: the devouring mother (emphasis in original) Idemon ignores that the Moon disposes Pluto, and that, as a result, there is an implicit Moon/Pluto conjunction in 2.
- The native as guru who doesn't have any answers.
Well, that's Richard Idemon's sketch (pgs. 73-84). Did you guess who it was? You have to have guessed!!! It was so obvious!!
The native's birth place was Kutchwada, India. The time was Indian Standard (IST). This was the chart for Rajneesh, also known as Osho. One of the most brilliant thinkers I have ever come across. And yes, for the longest time I thought he was a cheap clown, selling sex. Once I read his writing, I discovered Osho was far more than that.
To be fair, Idemon's "Magic Thread" technique is to note the overall emphais in the chart. Break it down by quality & element, by quadrant, by kinds of aspects, etc., noting carefully what there's a lot of, what there's not a lot of, what's missing. With this, Idemon constructs what I (not Idemon) term Dynamic Contrasts. This was not unique to Richard Idemon, and it is not magical, but mechanical. In the case above, Rajneesh has no air (Idemon says the ascendant, in Gemini doesn't count, and ignores the south node, in Libra), therefore (dynamic contrast interpretation) he has no ideas. He has only one planet in water (Pluto) so (dynamic contrast) has no feelings, ignoring the MC in Pisces. As Uranus is isolated by quadrant, and as Jupiter is the only planet in fixed, these loom very large in the interpretation. Dynamic contrast demands this, as it works by means of what you lack. And we all lack something.
In such an interpretive framework, what Rajneesh lacked was much more important than the Mars, Mercury, Venus, Moon, Saturn stellium in Capricorn, spread between the 7th & 8th houses. And this is because Richard did not know how to read a chart using rulerships & dispositors. The reason stelliums are powerful is that the planets that make up the stellium will always rule the rest of the chart. Rule the other planets. Rule the various house cusps. Stelliums suck the entire chart into themselves. Whenever you see a stellium in a chart, note carefully if its dispositor is part of the stellium itself, or if it is located elsewhere. In Rajneesh's case, a stellium in Capricorn will have Saturn as dispositor. If Saturn is in Capricorn, then the stellium disposes of itself, it is self-contained, as it were. It is therefore single-minded, and, if in a cardinal sign or angular house, might well exploit the world for its own benefit. In plain English, leave a big mark on the world. If Saturn had been in some other house & sign, then the focus of the stellium would have been split between itself, and the sign & house of its dispositor. If Saturn had been in, say Gemini in the first, Rajneesh would have oscillated between the stellium in 7-8, and the ascendant. Regardless whether there was an aspect between the two or not. An aspect (of any kind) would only have made the oscillation stronger, and would have qualified it by the nature of the aspect itself. Is this clear? It seems so simple to me.
For example, Rajneesh had Cancer on the 2nd - his possessions. He, a yogi, got his possessions from other people (yogis beg for a living). Which is clearly shown by the ruler of 2, the Moon, in the 8th (other people's money), in Capricorn. People felt good (Moon) when they gave things to him. He felt good (Cancer on 2) in receiving them. That he ultimately came to have an organized structure for receiving such gifts, and that he had a lot of traditionally valuable things given to him (fancy cars, etc.) is shown by Capricorn on 8. Pluto in Cancer in 2 hints of the danger of being "poisoned" by possessions. Since Pluto was opposed to the Moon, and as the Moon rules one's physical body (this is invariable), the poison Pluto produced would tend to catch Rajneesh by surprise (opposition). Cancer being a pack rat, Rajneesh had a tendency to collect too much, thus setting up Pluto for a rather bad ending - a lethal sting, if you like. Does this sound like Rajneesh? Pity that Idemon had no idea. (This one tiny vignette is more astrology than anything in Richard's book.)
The problem I have with astro-psychobabble is its advocates rarely have more than a superficial understanding of astrology. They back up their lack of knowledge with a strong ego. In this example, Richard Idemon, who believes himself to be smart (for reasons unknown) has taken someone he doesn't know, doesn't understand, and, so far as I can tell, doesn't like, and used astrology to destroy him. Make him a laughing stock. Invents details about his psychology & family that he, Idemon, has no evidence to support. So far as a "Magic Thread", something that connects everything together, I couldn't find it. The thread was whatever Richard said it was, the interpretation amounted to character assassination.
Which might be where the real magic comes in. You wanna be a Great Astrologer, like Richard Idemon? Well, that's easy. Stop being weak & defensive! Build up your ego! Astrology is Magic! It's whatever you decide it to be! When you read a chart, there's no need to stumble over the strange symbols & their hidden meanings! No need to study the fundamentals! You are empowered! You have the magical right to take what you think you know about the native & project it into the chart!! That's how the Great Astrologers do it!!
As astrologers, we get enough black eyes when we're right & we have the basic astrology to back us up. But when we use astrology merely to project private fantasies, we not only discredit ourselves, we harm astrology itself.
Wessex Astrologer, 263 pages.