Here is the back of the book:
Astrological psychosynthesis is a holistic approach to astrology, bringing not only greater self-understanding but also growth in consciousness. Based on the work of Robert Assagioli, the founder of psychosynthesis, it follows the premise that every human being has a soul - a higher self - which is at the root of all developmental processes.
Astrological psychosynthesis aims to help people to find their own true self and work consciously towards integration and wholeness. The horoscope is used not just as an analytical tool, but also as an instrument to enhance the processof self-realization and transformation.
I found the book abstract, but it might be that I'm not using it right. So let's try it out on me, see how I do.
Part 1: Intelligence. The Hubers have an aspect-oriented astrology. I have Saturn-Moon in sextile. Which is a Saturn-Moon, described on pgs. 33-34. Saturn's influence on the Moon can either very dampening and can thwart the Moon's joy in forming relationships and showing affection (the Hubers easily go off topic like this), or Saturn could give the Moon much needed structure and stability. Yes, all this is true, it's just not very specific.
Pg. 35, the three ego planets give best intelligence when well-integrated into the rest of the chart. Degree of effectiveness: Well, my Sun-Moon-Saturn are in aspect to each other, but so far as with the rest of the chart, Saturn and the Moon are in aspect to Mercury and Jupiter, but the Sun is not. Middle region of the sign (12 degrees): Only Jupiter and Mercury, the rest, no. Planet near a house cusp: Sun and Moon. Quality (house position): Sun at the top of the chart, yes. Moon in houses 12, 1, 6, 7: no. My Moon is in the 3rd (the 4th to Huber), which makes it hypersensitive and dependent (pg. 36). My Moon craves to be popular. Saturn: In houses 3 and 4 are best. Mine is in 5, a house the Hubers do not mention at all. Which I think means a 5th house Saturn is unremarkable.
Indicators of intelligence, pg. 39. Academic intelligence is Saturn-Jupiter-Mercury in any kind of trianglar aspect. Got that. Productive intelligence is a Jupiter-Mercury-Sun triangle. The only way Sun and Mercury can be triangulated is if they are semi-sextile, which is rare. Not me. Feeling intelligence is a Moon-Mercury-Jupiter triangle. Got that. Common sense is Moon-Mercury. Got that. Philosophical is Saturn-Jupiter-Sun/Mercury. Got that. (I am using Huber orbs.) Saturn-Jupiter conjunction is philosophy. No, don't have that. Aesthetic thought: Sun oppose Moon, Sun semi-sextile Venus (rare), Sun-Moon-Venus in aspect to Jupiter. Don't have that. Creative intelligence is Uranus-Jupiter-Mercury. Don't have that: Uranus is out of orb. Intuitive intelligence is Jupiter-Neptune-Mercury, with Sun in aspect to Neptune only. Don't have that. My Sun and Mercury are in conjunction, Jupiter-Neptune are out of orb. Intelligent will is Jupiter-Pluto-Mercury. Don't have that, either. Pluto is out of orb.
In the paragraph above, I count ten types of intelligence. I have four, and since mine are towards the beginning of the list, it would seem that my intelligence is of the ordinary kind. I am Academic, Feeling, Comon-sense and Philosophical. I am missing Productive, Philosophy (not the same as philosophical), Aesthetic, Creative, Intuitive and Intelligent will. The Hubers do not give a scorecard, so I do not know if they would think of me as smart, or not.
Note the Huber method does not care what kind of aspects, only that there are aspects. Trines and sextiles are calm and harmony, they are resources. Squares and oppositions are tension and inner stress. I have a good mix of both.
Position by house is sketchy. The Hubers pick up on the 3rd/9th polarity. Third house planets show collective thinking. Planets in the 9th want to be original thinkers. I have the Sun in one and the Moon in the other, which to the Hubers are unremarkable. Mercury in the 9th is an advantage.
The three modes, cardinal, fixed and mutable: The Hubers apply these to signs and houses equally. I have Jupiter and Saturn in cardinal signs (political thinking), but not cardinal (angular) houses. Since on balance the Hubers like houses more than signs, I am not a political type. Fixed thought is functional thinking. I have Sun, Moon and Mercury in fixed signs, but as they are in mutable houses, I think I should skip this and go to Mutable, which is artistic or philosophical thinking. And that's me. I see the whole world of life as being one giant web of interconnections from everything to everything else. Guys like me talk endlessly about love or, at a lesser level, sex And that's me to a T. Sex-crazed. I should learn about love! The philosophy of love, of course.
The next section puts us firmly into cardinal, fixed and mutable signs. In which I am firmly cardinal and fixed, both in the Huber method, and in the larger world of astrology as a whole. The Hubers discuss this for nearly two pages (pgs. 53-55) but never get beyond Cards do it this way vs: Fixed do it that way. The conclusion:
Such thought patterns are characteristic of these two personality types under pressure: the cardinal with one-upsmanship, trying to impress everyone [GUILTY!!!] and needing to make sure they are one jump ahead all the time; and the fixed, who are suspicious and anxious because they reckon that the world is out to get them. (pg. 55)
The final section on intelligence is temperament: Fire, Earth, Air, Water. I have a strong air chart, so I will look at air. I am argumentative (true), prone to be faulty (no), want to force my views on others (only if you want to go on reading this), look for opposing views (wrong: that only applies to oppositions) so I can take sides (only my side, thank-you very much), are unable to make decisions (no), are know-it-alls (not true of Libra), feel insecure under duress. By comparison to earth types, air types are better authors, but this is comparing apples to oranges. (Water makes for the best authors.) Air types never revise (wrong), air types have excellent vocabulary (sometimes).
The conclusion to this first chapter, on intelligence is of interest:
We must feel convinced that all types of intellect, be they Water or Fire, are equally valid [?], and must be allowed to function each in their own specific way. We should have the courage to say 'Yes' to ourselves, by recognizing and accepting the individual building blocks which, for better or worse, make up our personality. This is the best way for us to develop our potential to the full, and to learn to live at peace with ourselves.
If we allow people to pigeon-hole us, to strait-jacket us and to censor us, we'll have no chance to be true to ourselves, to find our own way, to fulfil our own potential.
And this after all is the greatest gift Astrological Psychology has to offer: to learn to know ourselves, make the most of our available energies, and to feel in charge of ourselves. Only then are we really capable of appreciating others, to understand them and accept them for who and what they are, and to help them forwards. (pgs. 65-66)
In the excerpt above is the inherent contradiction in astro-psychology. After one judgemental prononouncement after another comes the bland concluding statement that we are not pigeon-holing you. The author is strangely obsessed in using intelligence to establish relationships. Intelligence is inherently destructive. Intelligence is powerful precisely because it destroys established thought, separates one from another, and sows discord as a result. In Matthew 10:34 is the famous statement, I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword. This is not about violence, but about intelligence. Intelligence is the sword that cleaves all, that is mightier than any sword of steel. The Jesuit trained Huber should know this.
I am glad I took the time to work through this. I now understand Huber much better. As a stand-alone method, Huber is dreadful, but as a supplement to Sakoian and Acker or Robson, the Huber method will give many valid insights in their limited areas of interest. In other words, the Huber method will work very well if you already have a good grasp of the planets, the signs, the houses and the aspects (the Huber aspects are primitive), or good references to consult. These are, alas, precisely the areas of astrology the Hubers spurned. Which you will find in the Bibliography. There are sixteen entries. All but one of the eight astrology book entries are to other books by the Hubers. The one exception is Alice Bailey, which hardly qualifies as a book on astrology. The Hubers were not well-read.
HopeWell, 227 pages.